The “Word of Faith”: False Gospel, False Faith & False Teachers — Part 3

There is a tendency creeping into Evangelical churches, borrowing from the Word of Faith Movement, that puts a high value on praying using terms like “speaking” or “declaring over”, “speaking into” or “claiming.” There is a fine line between thanking God in prayer for what you know He has done, or what you know He will do as a legitimate interpretation of a clear biblical promise (e.g., raise the righteous to life on the last day, or save by grace whoever calls on His name) and praying as if your words have power to make something happen. The Word of Faith movement gets its name from a heretical misunderstanding of what “faith” in the Bible is. It promotes an idea of “faith” as a sort of creative force emanating from God, activated by the spoken word. As such, Word of Faith ideas have more in common with Rhonda Byrne’s The Secret, than with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Word-Faith teachers owe their ancestry to groups like Christian Science, Swedenborgianism, Theosophy, Science of Mind, and New Thought–not to classical Pentecostalism. It reveals that at their very core, Word-Faith teachings are corrupt. Their undeniable derivation is cultish, not Christian. The sad truth is that the gospel proclaimed by the Word-Faith movement is not the gospel of the New Testament. Word-Faith doctrine is a mongrel system, a blend of mysticism, dualism, and gnosticismthat borrows generously from the teachings of the metaphysical cults. The Word-Faith movement may be the most dangerous false system that has grown out of the charismatic movement so far, because so many charismatics are unsure of the finality of Scripture
(John MacArthur, Charismatic Chaos, p. 290)
There are many perculiar ideas and practices in the Faith theology, but what merits it the label ofheresy are the following: 1) its deistic view of God, who must dance to men’s attempts to manipulate the spiritual laws of the universe; 2) its demonic view of Christ, who was filled with “the Satanic nature” and must be “born again in hell; 3) its gnostic view of revelation, which demands denial of the physical senses and classifies Christians by their willingness to do so; and 4) its metaphysical view of salvation, which deifies man and spiritualizes the atonement, locating it in hell rather than on the cross, thereby subverting the crucial biblical belief that it is Christ’s physical death and shed blood, which alone atone for sin. All four of these heresies may be accounted for by Kenyon’s syncretism of methaphysical thought with traditional biblical doctrine”
(D.R. McConnell, A Different Gospel)

One of my hopes and motivations in continuing to work on this series on the Word of Faith is to cause Christians to think more carefully about what we believe and why we believe it. It disturbs me to hear Christians pray things like, “We speak healing into So-and-So…” or “We claim health for So-and-So…” or, “We speak against the Spirit of Poverty…” when I find no such example in the Bible. The primary message of Christianity is the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It is primarily about what Jesus did to overcome the barrier between God and man caused by sin and death, through His own substitutionary death on the cross. This Gospel has radical and eternal, far-reaching consequences. Some, like peace with God, spiritual life and prayer, affect life in the here-and-now. Others, like permanent healing, resurrection, and absolute prosperity, affect life in the coming age. It is the gray area in between the here-and-now and the coming age that creates confusion for many Christians, thus making them vulnerable to some of the teachings of the Word of Faith Movement.

Pastor Ken Jones has written a contribution to the forthcoming book, Keep Your Head Up, which can help equip sincere Christians to conform our faith and our prayers to the sound doctrines of the Bible.

“You don’t have a god in you, you are one… Pray to yourself because I’m in yourself and you’re in myself. We are one spirit saith the Lord. … I say this with all due respect so that I don’t upset you too bad, but I say it anyway. When I read in the Bible where he [Jesus] says, ‘I Am’, I just smile and say, ‘Yes. I Am too.’.”

Now who has the audacity to dare utter such blasphemous remarks? Kenneth Copeland, one of the recognized leaders of what has become known as the ‘Word of Faith Movement’. Other very recognizable names of leaders in this cultic movement include, Kenneth Hagin, Paul Crouch, John Avanzini, Robert Tilton, Fred Price and Benny Hinn. Whereas many, if not the majority within the Evangelical Church would strongly reject these and other peddlers of the Word of Faith heresy whose outlandish sermons are more easily recognized as being totally foreign to the biblical Gospel message of Jesus Christ, our guest, Ken Jones warns that the infinitely more subtle tactics of a new breed of Word of Faith teachers has enabled them to smuggle dangerous heresies, including the prosperity Gospel, into mainstream, Evangelical churches, schools and homes undetected.”

This is the intro to a radio interview with Pastor Ken Jones, on “Iron Sharpens Iron” on 1440AM WNYG hosted by Chris Arnzen. Listen to this excellent rebuttal of the Word of Faith movement here:

jones-word_of_faith_movement_refuted.mp3

 

 

 

 

2 Comments

  1. [Keruxai: Have lately been finding gems on the web. Here’s just one.]

          Futurism Was, Is, and Is To Come

         Preterists claim that the “Antichrist” and the “great tribulation” were fulfilled during the 70 AD period.
        
    If so, why do we find that the arrival of the Antichrist was regarded
    as a future event by writers who lived during and after 70 AD?
         Polycarp (70-167) wrote that “He comes as the Judge of the living and the dead.”
        
    Justin Martyr (100-168) said that “[Antichrist] shall venture to do
    unlawful deeds on the earth against us the Christians….”
         Irenaeus (140-202) wrote that the ten kings (Rev. 17)”shall give their kingdom to the beast, and put the church to flight.”
        
    It’s not true that Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) “revived” futurism
    because it was never lost during the Middle Ages or prior to that period
    of time.
         Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153) stated: “There
    remains only one thing – that the demon of noonday [Antichrist] should
    appear.”
         Roger Bacon (1214-1274) spoke of “future perils [for the Church] in the times of Antichrist….”
         John Wycliffe (1320-1384) referred to “the hour of temptation, which is coming upon all the world, Rev. iii.”
        
    Martin Luther (1483-1546): “[The book of Revelation] is intended as a
    revelation of things that are to happen in the future….”
        
    (Google or Yahoo “Famous Rapture Watchers” to see quotes from many
    Christian leaders throughout the Church Age which prove that they
    expected a future Antichrist and a future great tribulation.)
        
    Preterists use Matt. 24:34 (“This generation will not pass….”) to try
    to prove a 70 AD fulfillment of “Antichrist.” Since many of them see
    “these” (Matt. 25:46) fulfilled in the future in Rev. 20, why can’t they
    apply futurism as easily to Matt. 24:34? After all, the word “this” is
    the singular form of “these”!
         To see something that preterists, historicists, and futurists can all agree on, Google “Pretrib Rapture Secrets.”

    1. Thanks Johnny. It’s common sense that just because an ancient writer thought a particular event was still future to him, that he cannot be claimed to be a futurist on that basis alone. Likewise with the writers of the Reformation period speaking of future events: that they believe some events are future is not a vote for futurism. Futurism is unique in that it holds that all or most events predicted in Revelation are still future today. And yes, Ribera did indeed revive futurism under a new form, namely that the events of Revelation would occupy only a brief period immediately before the second advent. Up until that time, the dominant view within Catholic circles was an amillennial idealism that did not compress Revelation’s predictions into such a short, future period.

      Luther and Wycliffe, however, are both well-documented in their identification of the papacy as the Man of Lawlessness and Antichrist. Nor did they expect a single, one-man Antichrist, but rather the office of the Popes itself was known to be the Antichrist. When Luther spoke of the futurity of the book of Revelation, he was saying that it was “intended” by John as a “revelation of things that are to happen in the future” from John’s point of view.
      Not sure what you were pointing to when asking that I Google “pretrib rapture secrets”. I wasn’t sure what you were recommending among the search results.

Comments are closed.